I'm still hitting 60FPS even when I clock my gpu up and crank all my hardware-side Anisotropic filtering, supersampling (read, actually rendering the game at 4K, still 60FPS), and antialiasing settings to their highest levels. And I put mine in a Fractal Design Define R4 case with FD Silent Series R2 hydraulic bearing fans, and I never hear a thing. UserBenchmark USA-User . the penalty for 4x MFAA (approximates the look of 8x MSAA) is practically nothing. The vapor-x model is excellent with heat (I have the 290 version, never reached 70 degrees on a chip made for 95, usually between 55-60, 970s are excellent for 1080p content, its only really at 1440p and higher you run into their ram issue. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second. What I've seen in most benchmarks is the 290X wins in select games if your resolution is high enough. GeForce GTX 970. IMO R9 290X is a better card. Mine is playing everything so far at max settings with framerates at least 50+ (Crysis 3 is the lowest at around 50'ish). GeForce GTX 970. DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics. A case in point is the Radeon R9 ... We can add another wrinkle into this performance mix by looking at the results of the GeForce GTX 970 GPU in two-card SLI. I sympathize with your notion of running crossfire because if you don't have a full size case and ample space between the PCI-E slots, your cards will be cramped and dramatically throttle each-other with the ambient heat. Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench. http://hexus.net/tech/news/graphics/80458-amd-adding-finishing-touches-radeon-300-series/. they just don't have the GPU power to reasonably push it hard in all games. Based on 693,408 user benchmarks for the AMD R9 290 and the Nvidia GTX 970, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. the 290X isn't crippled with memory issues - on the 970 the bottom 3.5GB of the memory is full speed, but the 'top' .5GB is 1/7th speed. Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench. AMD is heavily supporting Star Citizen with Mantle, so I think in the long run R290x would be a better choice, unless GTX970 will support DX12 or the features which allows more drawcalls (also known as performance). Radeon R9 290X. I will explain why. next gen cant get here fast enough! Are there people running SC today on a 970 or a 290X either in a single card or Crossfire/SLI set-up? Radeon R9 290X. AMD Radeon R9 290 Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 The graphics card contains two graphics processing units (GPUs). The 380x is supposed to be a repackaged(slightly enhanced) 290x at roughly the same price it is now. GTX 970 vs R9 290 (or 290X) So, I'm putting together a new rig. Actually, my r9 290x smokes the gtx 970. *don't take nvidia's hard vram amount seriously. It's whether or not you want to save money on the card, and spend a few pennies here or there on a little extra electricity, or spend more money up front on the card to get a little savings in electricity (again, pennies, as in minor difference, especially if you'd use the same PSU either way). Easily fixed. The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth. Random-access memory (RAM) is a form of volatile memory used to store working data and machine code currently in use. A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It just blazes everything at 2k. AMD Radeon R9 290X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 specs comparison All rows with different specifications or features are highlighted . I've asked around in many places, but I totally forgot to ask on here! *9XX series hardware has MFAA, MFAA is EPIC! Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps. It’s a reply to AMD’s Radeon R9 290, which has … GTX 970/980 is definitely faster and a lot more power efficient than GTX 780 Ti or R9 290X. This generally results in better performance than a … GeForce GTX 970. for 4K (which is what i play at) forget 290x's and 970's entirely. The system can even push 4k on Cryengine games smoothly, although I only have a 2k monitor right now (the 4k was borrowed and had issues). We consider a smaller width better because it assures easy maneuverability. The R9 390X is faster than the overclocked 290X or aftermarket 290Xes which trade blows with the factory overclocked GTX 970. This page is currently only available in English. And yet even with that memory bug, it consistently beats the 290X in most benchmarks. what happens down the road? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202145&cm_re=R9_290-. Heat is not the problem. At that point it comes down to price, if you can get a good 290X for cheaper I'd say it's worth it since SC has a very good chance of being a VRAM hog and you don't want to hit that stuttering if you pass 3.5Gb usage. Now that AMD has dropped the prices on the R9 290X cards, they are cheaper than the GTX 970. But what you're hearing about it getting hot is simply a matter of whether or not you want to go in the settings and run the card cooler - which even I can do with a reference card. I am considering upgrading from the GTX660 to a GTX970 or R9 290x (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202145&cm_re=R9_290--14-202-145--Product) but I want to know for sure before I shell out $300. At 1080P GTX 970 might be 2% faster but @ 1440P - 4K R9 290X starts gaining on a GTX 970. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed. Associate. Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses). A collection of Witcher 3: Wild Hunt benchmark runs from two cut-scenes and gameplay from one of the most CPU-intensive parts of the game, Novigrad City. While GTX 970 can only use 3.5GB and if you go above it starts stuttering. 290x user here, picked up the tri-x version for the OC and stock fan config. I'm worried that the 290X has a REALLY high power draw and reportedly runs hot, which would rule out running two of them at once. the 970 has 3.5gb + .5gb of "still faster than fetching to your dram". If I knew of a firm release date happening soon, I might hold out. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view. They were basically the same when the 970 first came out. The number of GPUs supported when using a multi-GPU configuration. GTX 970 vs R9 290 vs R9 290X GTX 970 Votes: 50 58.1% R9 290 Votes: 12 14.0% R9 290X Votes: 24 27.9% Total voters 86; Oct 26, 2014 #1 S. Scatcats22 n00b. The aftermarket cooled ones will outperform mine, and run cooler and quieter. What's your PSU? Segui. Running with a FX 8320 It handles anything I throw at it. Tom's Hardware. The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second. I still just have a 1080p screen, and the 970 is winning all those benchmarks. So I just searched for a release date and found an earlier article saying they were coming out in October of 2014, which obviously didn't happen. I'm just hoping it'll be enough to run whatever Oculus has available when the PU launches. the third gen delta compression saves space & bandwidth on average of 19-29%. The cheapest GTX 970, R9 290 and R9 290X GPUs on Newegg (from top to bottom) With AMD's R9 290 and R9 290X both aggressively priced to compete with the GTX 970 consumers are able to … The R9 290X only seems to do better in benchmarks at really high resolutions from what I'm seeing so far, so the 970 should be the performance winner at 1080p and worth the price. An R9 290 is cheap, supports FreeSync, and is fast. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. R9 390 - Many current sources say that it yields slightly better performance than the GTX 970 - Runs cooler and quieter than 290X, but hotter and noisier than 970 - Uses less power than 290X, but significantly more than 970 - Harder to overclock than GTX 970 - Most expensive (I can currently get it for £7 more than the GTX 970) there isnt really an honest upside benefit to the 290x's. Before displaying results, remember that … Specifically, higher memory bandwidth of the Radeon R9 290X is a result of wider memory bus. (this is also why everyone that tries to calculate what resolution causes a slowdown off the framebuffer size fails with the 9XX series maxwell hardware. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance. Great framerate, great performance but like some other posts here said, card is aging and can confirm it sucks power. I have a reference (not aftermarket, read: subpar) R9 290x I got for 300 used. Radeon R9 290X. The GTX 970 has a 10 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 290X, but the R9 290X has 8 more Render Output Units than the GTX 970. When we compare the $429 MSI 390X Gaming 8G against the $479 GTX 980, it does OK at 3840×2160 but the gap widens further in favor of the GeForce below 4K resolutions. Metro: Last Light - 3840x2160 - Medium Quality Frames per Second - … May 26, 2015 15:20 EDT Share Tweet Submit. Using more than one GPU in parallel can give increased performance. Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image. Power draw generally shouldn't be a big factor in choosing a card unless you're constrained. it looks better/runs faster than ATI's old abandoned SSAA. I plan on getting a 390x and using the 290x in CF. Overclock your GTX 970 and void your warranty, but also put shame on the GTX 780 Ti in many tests. 2x290x will be a better option for multicard 4k setups but will consume way more power. The aftermarket cards you get today will not run hot. ... AMD Radeon R9 290X … Crysis 3 averages 25% compression at all times. Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. GeForce GTX 970. The graphics card supports multi-display technology. The graphics card contains two graphics processing units (GPUs). Id say if you can get a 290x in for $200 vs a 970 for $240, Id get the 290x. Texel Rate. il be doing oop, general programming, web dev, imaging work and light gaming. Am I doing something wrong? 58.80 GP/s. All cards back as far as the GTX500 series will eventually support DX12 according to NVidia. Joined: 16 Jan 2015 Posts: 52. so im looking to get a full setup and im jumping between the gtx 970 and r9 290x 8gb. I'm running a 4770K liquid cooled, 32 gb ram and two Powercolor 290X's with liquid cooling (chip-only using the NZXT gfx cooler, not the whole board) in Crossfire, all in a NZXT H440 case. The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. GeForce GTX 970 Radeon R9 290X; TDP: 148 watts: vs: 290 watts: Release Date: 19 Sep 2014: vs: 24 Oct 2013: Raw Performance comparison. Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort. I was about to buy a pair of GTX 970 when i saw on recent GTX 980 Classified Review on LinusTechTips channel that the 290x is really close to the GTX 970.I might do a bit of an overclock on the cards, so thats a point for Maxwell, but the 290X … Now wait let me clarify. Sniper Elite 4 will start us out. Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) is a high-speed interface standard for connecting components, such as graphics cards and SSDs, to a motherboard. Did I mention mantle? I think a 290x or a 970 will probably be alright for optimized finished SC but most likely not high/max settings since they seem to be pushing the envelope. A GTX 970 will be slightly faster than a 290x now that the drivers have matured. And the 970 memory issue may get resolved with a driver update they said. gtx 970 or r9 290x 8gb. The vapor-x model is excellent with heat (I have the 290 version, never reached 70 degrees on a chip made for 95, usually between 55-60). Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance. I recently went from the 970 to the 290x since I didn't like the idea of the separated memory and I planned to bump to 4k soon(4k is where the issues are supposed to hit). What about temperatures? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, random thoughts from a 2x980 owner: *get this out of the way. right now the 980's are really the only way to go at super high res. Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX 970. GigaPixels - higher is better. the 290's have more hard vram. so FOR RIGHT NOW trying to push high resolution on AMD cards is painful. What you're hearing about the 290x taking power is true. Max settings every game, including SC and even the horribly optimized games run well. I mean enough of a difference on my elec bill so that I thought someone was stealing from me. The R9 290X only seems to do better in benchmarks at really high resolutions from what I'm seeing so far, so the 970 should be the performance winner at 1080p and worth the price. AMD Radeon R9 290X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 - EVGA GeForce GTX 970 FTW with reference BIOS Product Ratings & Comparisons. I should add that these cards (especially the tri-x) are BIG. Show only OP | 3 Feb 2015 at 15:45 #1. cairns84. GigaTexels - higher is better. If you plan on doing 4k gaming then even the 970 in SLI will run into the architecture problem that has put them in the news. I tweaked the standard temperature on the card down, and boost the fan slightly, and it never gets hot. The liquid cooling alleviates the noise issue altogether, temps are never a problem, and everything fit nicely in the midsize H440. next gen API support is a wash for both camps) *currently the nvidia cards are head & shoulders faster than AMD in star citizen. the issue there is spending extra money for liquid cooling the r9's where the entire 9xx series overclocked farther (>1500mhz gpu is common) are still cool & quiet on air. personally, as long as you're sticking with sub 1600p resolutions i'd get a 970, between the 970 and 290x. 64.00 GP/s. I've got a 290x and I get about 45 fps on very high (1440p). (i bet AMD is scrambling to remake their own version now) *if voxel lighting ever happens, youll hopefully be able to run it (the tech demos look awesome) *half the power draw for the same performance, More posts from the starcitizen community. Late to the conversation here but your setup is very similar to mine (have the same FX8320). If you are going above 1080p then the 290x is a better option. Radeon R9 290X is connected to the rest of the system using a … Now I'm seeing a quote saying Q2 2015 (April-June). this causes severe performance issues in games like star citizen that uses a lot of vram. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its performance. The 970 is faster, but you have to recognize that they're both very fast. The GTX 970 and the 290X have been natural competitors with the GTX 970 holding its own against the aftermarket 290Xes, so a faster 390X should be a slightly slower competitor to the GTX 980 at around $450-499. I'm about to build a new computer with some tax money and Star Citizen is one of the games I'm building it specifically for. I'm content to run the game at 1080p (don't have a 4K monitor and I'd probably just get poor framerates at that resolution). SC has extremely poor AMD optimization now & they cant be bothered to stop & fix it while rebuilding the game engine for 64 bit computation. The Witcher 3 GTX 970/980/Titan X vs R9 290/290X Benchmark Frame-Rate Tests. Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by cairns84, 3 Feb 2015. 176.00 GT/s. Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. However, Mantle is supposed to bring major performance gains in the future and Star Citizen is one of those games that will take advantage of it. Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display. AMD Radeon R9 290X vs MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming 100ME, 0.71 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance, 2012MHz higher effective memory clock speed, XFX Radeon RX 570 RS XXX Edition 1286MHz, 8gb GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, AMD Graphics Card (RX-570P8DFD6), XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS XXX Edition 1386MHz OC+, 8GB GDDR5, VR Ready, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, AMD Graphics Card (RX-580P8DFD6), Sapphire Radeon 11265-05-20G Pulse RX 580 8GB GDDR5 Dual HDMI/ DVI-D/ Dual DP OC with Backplate (UEFI) PCI-E Graphics Card Graphic Cards, XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1405MHz OC+, 8gb 256bit GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Double Dissipation, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, PCI-E AMD Graphics Card (RX-580P828D6), Biostar Radeon RX 560 4GB GDDR5 128-Bit DirectX 12 PCI Express 3.0 DVI-D Dual Link, HDMI, DisplayPort and Dual Cooling Fan Gaming Edition VA5615RF41-TBMRA-BS2, MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1070 8GB GDDR5 SLI DirectX 12 VR Ready Graphics Card (GeForce GTX 1070 Gaming 8G), MSI GAMING GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GDRR5 192-bit HDCP Support DirectX 12 Dual Fan VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1060 6GT OCV1) (Renewed), MSI Computer GeForce 4GB GDDR5 DVI/HDMI/3DisplayPorts PCI-Express Video Graphic Card GTX 980 4GD5 OCV1. This is the subreddit for everything related to Star Citizen - an up and coming epic space sim MMO being developed by Chris Roberts and Cloud Imperium Games. Your linked source recommends the 970 as the better card over the 290X. Otherwise the GTX 970 is the best card for the money. A lower TDP typically means that it consumes less power. Sniper Elite 4 Benchmark – R9 290X 2019 vs. RTX 2070, 2060, GTX 970, RX 590. AMD Radeon R9 290X MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming 100ME The graphics card contains two graphics processing units (GPUs). Display outputs include: 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort. I have money in hand and I'm ready to order parts. OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics. I paid $350 for it, if you can find a better deal than that It's great hardware, the drivers are solid, and mantle. The alpha runs pretty damn well on a 970, I've tried multiple cards and always get bad drops in later vanduul waves (13+). What is performance like? If you are willing to wait for about 3 to 6 weeks(rumored) AMD is supposed to be launching the 390x and possibly the 380x. So, which would you recommend? The width represents the horizontal dimension of the product. R9 290X can use all 4GB of its VRAM. (its especially bad in crossfire). If you get a 290X with a good cooler the heat shouldn't be an issue either. Press J to jump to the feed. Honestly they are both good. r9 290x vapor beats my gtx 970, but the gtx 970 beats my standard r9 heaven bench marks: r9 290 vapor : 1934 gtx 970: 1892 r9 290 standard: 1828 if you can fix amd over heating you can over clock it like a boss. This generally results in better performance than a similar, single-GPU graphics card. Joined Sep 29, 2014 Messages 23. 5 anni fa | 528 visualizzazioni. 109.20 GT/s. Another said mid-February, which didn't happen. It is a quick-access, temporary virtual storage that can be read and changed in any order, thus enabling fast data processing. I have owned X2 R9 290X's in Crossfire for a year now. The thermal design power (TDP) is the maximum amount of power the cooling system needs to dissipate. Based on 661,329 user benchmarks for the AMD R9 290X and the Nvidia GTX 970, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card. A higher transistor count generally indicates a newer, more powerful processor. Newer versions can support more bandwidth and deliver better performance. CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS ... 290X 290. 212.39 mHash/s. The Witcher 3 Benchmark GTX 970/980/Titan X vs R9 290/290X. Being a dual-slot card, the AMD Radeon R9 290X draws power from 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector, with power draw rated at 290 W maximum. This generally results in better performance than a similar, single-GPU graphics card. I will be gaming at either 1440p @ 27" or 4K at 40", at 60Hz. The 290 is cheaper, the 290X about the same price, and in other games the performance similar. 625.33 mHash/s. Don't underestimate the power of the R9 290x. What should i get for money value and FPS per $. I run AC on very high, used the CFG to run it at UHD, with the GPU settings standard (not OC'd) at over 60FPS. Are you going to want to crossfire or SLI? http://www.nicolas11x12techx.com/ Nicolas11x12 comparing the NVIDIA GTX 970 with the AMD R9 290 Graphics Card. I had to make some 'alterations' just to get the card in the box. its dynamic based on the game/engine in question). 105.88 mPixels/s. Oct 25, 2019; 4 min read; R9 390x Vs Gtx 970 At 1080p Resolution How has your performance been in the past couple months? 지포스 gtx970 vs 라데온 r9 290x 성능 비교~ 고성능 컴퓨터를 구입하실때 cpu의 경우 intel i5, i7으로 많이 기울어집니다. By Archie Paras. Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 970 is the newer and more expensive GPU, with prices that run from £260 to £316. so on average that's actually 4.375gb + 0.625gb of vram for the 970's (and 5gb on the 980). 105.04 mPixels/s. too many situations out there where the both can struggle to hit a consistent 60fps in hard games today. Allows you to connect to a display using DVI. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory. So that's 25% more effective space & 25% less bandwidth being used. - The old 290x has a lot more stream processors (equivalent to CUDA cores) and a lot more memory bandwidth (512bit vs. 256 bit) - The new 970 has a bit more core clock and considerably higher memory clock, has newer technology and consumes half the power (Asus Strix has higher factory clocks than the standard ones) If you want performance on cryengine games, the R9 290x will beat or match the 970 every time (source), but with other games it's pretty much an even match. They are both enough for 60fps 1440p gaming. Radeon R9 290X. amd의 경우 가성비가 좋으면서도 인지도 부족과 … Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU. regarding SC: *mantle is a moot issue AFA SC is concerned (SC long ago confirmed to support mantle and then confirmed dx12 support when that got further along. Pixel Rate. I'm worried that the 290X has a REALLY high power draw and reportedly runs hot, which would rule out running two of … Sapphire Tri-X Radeon R9 390X With Back Plate.